Breadcrumb

Miyamoto Satsuma mandarin

Citrus unshiu Marcovitch

CRC 4216
VI 779


Source

Received as budwood from Spain via CCPP, 10/2009.


Parentage/origins

Limb sport of 'Miyagawa' Satsuma mandarin. According to Saunt (2000): "Miyamoto arose as a limb mutation discovered in 1960 on a Miyagawa Wase tree on L Miyamoto's property, Shimotsu-cho, Wakayama Prefecture.


Rootstocks of accession

Carrizo citrange


Season of ripeness at Riverside

October to November


Notes and observations

RRK, 8/69/2010: "Although thought to be virus-free when first released, it was discovered that Miyamoto was carrying citrus mosaic virus, known in Japan as 'Toromikan' (tiger mandarin) which slowed down the rapid increase in plantings. Nevertheless, Miyamoto is currently the most popular Goko Wase [editor's note: very early satsuma group] variety with an estimated 2,500 ha in production.

"Miyamoto, which matures 10 days and 15 to 20 days earlier than Okitsu and Miyagawa respectively, has other superior traits such as good colour, particularly the flesh, and a high Brix level. The fruit is medium in size and more spherical in shape than Okitsu or Miyagawa. Miyamoto is reported to be a hgih yielding variety and has a tendency to set a large crop."

In China, the fruit is described as "Fruit obloid, yellowish orange, sizes uniformly in 5.5 cm X 6.8 cm, apex flattened, oil glands slightly conspicuous. Fruit marketing season commences in middle-late September. TSS above 8.0 %, acid content below 1.0 %. In the areas with higher accumulated temperature, it matures 15 days earlier than Miyagawa wase."

‘Miyamoto’ Satsuma is reported to be a limbsport of ‘Miyagawa’ discovered on the property of L. Miyamoto, in Wakayama, Japan, and was donated to the Fruit Tree Research Station in Okitsu, Shizuoka, Japan. Budwood was sent to the Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias in Valencia, Spain, in 1988 and donated to the CCPP in 2007. Of the different cultivars in the Goko Wase very early maturing group of satsuma mandarins, ‘Miyamoto’ is currently the most popular variety with an estimated 2,500 ha in production (Saunt 2000). Fruit of ‘Miyamoto’ matures 10 days earlier than ‘Okitsu’ and 15 to 20 days earlier than ‘Miyagawa’ and has other superior traits such as good rind and flesh color and high sugar content at maturity (Saunt 2000). The fruit is reported to be medium in size and more spherical in shape than ‘Okitsu’ or ‘Miyagawa’ with high yield (Saunt 2000). In China, the marketing season commences in middle-late September. In those areas of China with higher heat accumulation, the fruit matures 15 days earlier than ‘Miyagawa’ fruit (Deng 2008).

Trees of ‘Miyamoto’ were planted in the Demonstration blocks at Exeter and Riverside last spring. Once the young trees of ‘Miyamoto’ begin fruiting in CA, quality traits of this cultivar will be compared with other satsuma selections from the same locations to determine the degree of similarity in California. (From Siebert, T., Vidalakis, G., Krueger, K., Bash, J., and Kahn, T. 2011. Background and initial evaluations of recently introduced cultivars distributed by the Citrus Clonal Protection Program. Citrograph.  2(4): 28-35)


Availability

Please refer to the CCPP for information on an approved budsource.

 

USDA Germplasm Resources Information Network page for Miyamoto Satusuma mandarin


CVC Fruit Quality data for Miyamoto Satsuma mandarin

Controls used in evaluations were Okitsu WaseFrost OwariMiho Wase, and China S-9 Satsumas.

CULTIVAR LOCATION DATE Julian date ROOT AGE SSC1 (%) SSC2 (%) Mean SSC tit1 (V/ml) tit2 (V/ml) Mean tit Citric acid (%) SSC/TA # FRUIT LENGTH  AVG. LENGTH  WIDTH AVG. WIDTH L/W WEIGHT AVG. WT. COLOR TEXTURE RIND SEEDS AVG. SEEDS INTERIOR  JUICE WT.  % JUICE
Miyamoto Riverside 8/30/2013 242 CZO 3 7.40 7.40 7.40 4.64 4.55 4.59 1.12 6.63 10.00 53.80 5.38 63.20 6.32 0.85 1115.10 111.51 5.00 2.00 26.00 0.00 0.00 MD OR 540.70 48.49
Miyamoto Riverside  8/31/2012 244 CZO 2 6.10 6.10 6.10 5.86 5.68 5.77 1.41 4.33 10.00 50.60 5.06 67.50 6.75 0.75 1240.90 124.09 4.50 2.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 10 LT OR 596.60 48.08
Miyamoto Riverside 9/2/2014 245 CZO 4 8.80 8.90 8.85 3.00 2.96 2.98 0.72 12.22 10.00 56.50 5.65 72.70 7.27 0.78 1537.70 153.77 5.00 3.50 41.00 0.00 0.00 10 LT OR 620.60 40.36
Miyamoto Lindcove 9/2/2014 245 C35 1 7.50 7.50 7.50 5.38 4.96 5.17 1.26 5.97 5.00 26.30 5.26 29.40 5.88 0.89 441.70 88.34 3.50 3.00 26.00 1.00 0.20 10 VLT OR 181.10 41.00
Miyamoto Riverside 9/6/2016 250 CZO 5 8.80 8.90 8.85 3.01 3.05 3.03 0.73 12.09 10.00 60.70 6.07 71.20 7.12 0.85 1552.20 155.22 4.40 4.50 38.00 3.00 0.30 2 MD OR, 8 LT OR 699.80 45.08
Miyamoto Riverside 9/6/2016 250 CZO 4 8.90 8.90 8.90 3.64 3.64 3.64 0.88 10.12 10.00 61.40 6.14 71.80 7.18 0.86 1589.80 158.98 4.20 5.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 3 MD OR, 7 LT OT 709.60 44.63
Miyamoto Lindcove 9/6/2016 250 CZO 3 8.70 8.80 8.75 3.87 3.82 3.85 0.93 9.41 10.00 47.70 4.77 59.40 5.94 0.80 918.60 91.86 4.40 3.00 21.00 0.00 0.00 10 LT OR 264.40 28.78
Miyamoto Lindcove 9/6/2016 250 C35 3 7.60 7.60 7.60 3.75 3.71 3.73 0.91 8.40 10.00 53.90 5.39 70.20 7.02 0.77 1504.00 150.40 4.40 3.50 30.00 0.00 0.00 10 LT OR 804.80 53.51
Miyamoto Riverside 9/8/2015 251 CZO 4 8.10 8.00 8.05 3.53 3.54 3.54 0.86 9.39 10.00 47.40 4.74 62.60 6.26 0.76 926.70 92.67 4.50 4.50 37.50 0.00 0.00 10 LT OR 393.60 42.47
Miyamoto Riverside 9/8/2015 251 CZO 3 7.90 7.80 7.85 3.97 3.97 3.97 0.96 8.15 10.00 51.50 5.15 61.40 6.14 0.84 985.10 98.51 4.20 4.50 44.10 0.00 0.00 10 LT OR 406.20 41.23
Miyamoto Riverside 9/26/2016 270 CZO 5 7.70 7.70 7.70 2.62 2.72 2.67 0.65 11.88 7.00 44.90 6.41 55.10 7.87 0.81 1312.00 187.43 5.30 5.50 37.00 0.00 0.00 10 LT OR 471.40 35.93
Miyamoto Riverside 9/26/2016 270 CZO 4 9.00 8.90 8.95 2.69 2.63 2.66 0.64 13.93 5.00 30.60 6.12 37.40 7.48 0.82 804.40 160.88 5.20 5.20 26.00 1.00 0.20 10 LT OR 293.60 36.50
Miyamoto Riverside 9/26/2013 269 CZO 3 7.90 8.00 7.95 3.23 3.16 3.19 0.77 10.21 10.00 58.20 5.82 67.30 6.73 0.86 1237.60 123.76 5.00 4.00 18.00 0.00 0.00 10 MED OR 523.10 42.27
Miyamoto Lindcove 9/28/2016 272 CZO 3 7.80 7.70 7.75 2.05 2.04 2.04 0.50 15.64 10.00 53.60 5.36 72.30 7.23 0.74 1557.60 155.76 5.10 3.90 34.00 0.00 0.00 10 LT OR 613.40 39.38
Miyamoto Riverside 9/28/2015 271 CZO 4 7.80 7.80 7.80 3.28 3.33 3.31 0.80 9.72 10.00 47.20 4.72 64.20 6.42 0.74 963.00 96.30 4.70 3.00 31.00 0.00 0.00 10 MED OR 346.80 36.01
Miyamoto Riverside 9/28/2015 271 CZO 3 7.60 7.50 7.55 2.64 2.65 2.65 0.64 11.75 10.00 55.80 5.58 71.00 7.10 0.79 1270.20 127.02 4.60 3.00 36.00 0.00 0.00 10 MED OR 459.20 36.15
Miyamoto Lindcove 10/17/2016 291 CZO 4 7.30 7.20 7.25 2.37 2.36 2.36 0.57 12.61 10.00 60.10 6.01 76.40 7.64 0.79 1747.60 174.76 5.20 5.20 41.00 1.00 0.10 10 MED OR 639.40 36.59
Miyamoto Riverside 10/17/2016 291 CZO 5 7.90 7.90 7.90 2.62 2.58 2.60 0.63 12.53 10.00 84.40 8.44 68.90 6.89 1.22 2125.00 212.50 5.50 4.50 67.00 0.00 0.00 10 LT OR 608.80 28.65
Miyamoto Riverside 10/19/2015 292 CZO 4 7.70 7.70 7.70 2.70 2.73 2.71 0.66 11.69 10.00 48.30 4.83 65.50 6.55 0.74 922.50 92.25 4.00 4.00 37.10 0.00 0.00 10 MED OR 286.60 31.07
Miyamoto Riverside 10/19/2015 292 CZO 3 6.00 6.10 6.05 2.21 2.19 2.20 0.54 11.24 10.00 54.20 5.42 69.90 6.99 0.78 1175.30 117.53 4.00 4.00 50.10 1.00 0.10 10 MED OR 399.30 33.97
Miyamoto Riverside 11/6/2015 310 CZO 4 9.30 9.30 9.30 2.89 2.89 2.89 0.70 13.35 10.00 48.80 4.88 68.40 6.84 0.71 1077.50 107.75 9.50 4.50 43.00 0.00 0.00 10 MED OR 366.80 34.04
Miyamoto Riverside 11/6/2015 310 CZO 3 7.40 7.40 7.40 1.88 1.96 1.92 0.47 15.85 10.00 56.90 5.69 73.20 7.32 0.78 1269.50 126.95 7.50 6.50 43.00 0.00 0.00 10 MED OR 282.20 22.23
Miyamoto Lindcove 11/7/2016 312 C35 3 8.10 8.10 8.10 2.18 2.14 2.16 0.52 15.46 10.00 62.40 6.24 78.70 7.87 0.79 1802.00 180.20 10.80 4.20 42.00 0.00 0.00 10 MED OR 384.00 21.31

 

Bibliography

Deng XX (Chief Editor). 2008. Citrus Varieties in China. unspecified China Agriculture Press. Comment: P 68

Saunt, J. 2000. Citrus Varieties Of The World (2nd ed). unspecified Sinclair International, Norwich, England. Comment: Pp 46-37.

Siebert, T., Vidalakis, G., Krueger, K., Bash, J., and Kahn, T. 2011. Background and initial evaluations of recently introduced cultivars distributed by the Citrus Clonal Protection Program. Citrograph.  2(4): 28-35

 

 

 

crc4216_001
crc4216_002
crc4216_003
Photos by David Karp and Toni Siebert, CVC.
Let us help you with your search